<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 71 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee firm was a genuine partnership of five partners as per the deed dated 21st February 1969. The CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was deemed invalid, and the ITO&#039;s orders granting continuation of registration for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 were upheld. The appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 71 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the assessee firm was a genuine partnership of five partners as per the deed dated 21st February 1969. The CIT&#039;s invocation of Section 263 was deemed invalid, and the ITO&#039;s orders granting continuation of registration for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73 were upheld. The appeals by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>