<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (10) TMI 70 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 1,00,850 levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1970-71. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not justified as the assessee had voluntarily disclosed all investments and offered for assessment, and there was no evidence of fraud or neglect on the assessee&#039;s part in explaining the sources of investments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (10) TMI 70 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 1,00,850 levied under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 1970-71. The Tribunal held that the penalty was not justified as the assessee had voluntarily disclosed all investments and offered for assessment, and there was no evidence of fraud or neglect on the assessee&#039;s part in explaining the sources of investments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>