<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (7) TMI 94 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70510</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the investment in M/s Meenakshi Finance Corporation was made in the individual capacity of the assessee and not as part of the H.U.F. assessment. The share income from the firm could not be included in the H.U.F. assessment, as there was no evidence that the investment was made using joint family funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:35:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (7) TMI 94 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70510</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the investment in M/s Meenakshi Finance Corporation was made in the individual capacity of the assessee and not as part of the H.U.F. assessment. The share income from the firm could not be included in the H.U.F. assessment, as there was no evidence that the investment was made using joint family funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>