<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 111 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, reversing the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). It held that hotel buildings cannot be considered as plant and machinery for claiming higher rates of depreciation, and depreciation would be allowable only at ordinary rates prescribed for buildings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 111 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, reversing the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). It held that hotel buildings cannot be considered as plant and machinery for claiming higher rates of depreciation, and depreciation would be allowable only at ordinary rates prescribed for buildings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>