<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 115 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70488</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as it found no causal nexus between the extinguishment of rights in the building and the claimed short-term capital loss. It emphasized that the sale of demolished materials was an independent transaction and did not constitute a &quot;transfer&quot; under Section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act. Therefore, the assessee was not entitled to claim the capital loss of Rs. 1,12,875.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:19:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 115 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70488</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as it found no causal nexus between the extinguishment of rights in the building and the claimed short-term capital loss. It emphasized that the sale of demolished materials was an independent transaction and did not constitute a &quot;transfer&quot; under Section 2(47) of the Income-tax Act. Therefore, the assessee was not entitled to claim the capital loss of Rs. 1,12,875.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>