<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 208 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70473</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the invocation of section 64 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in a case concerning the classification of capital gains on the sale of a house property. The Tribunal directed the assessment to follow the pattern of treating the land as long-term capital gains and the building as short-term capital gains based on the contributions of the assessee-husband and his wife. It also determined that the land and building could be treated as separate assets, upholding the classification of the land as long-term and the building as short-term capital gains. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the cross-objection in part regarding the apportionment of capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:20:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 208 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70473</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the invocation of section 64 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in a case concerning the classification of capital gains on the sale of a house property. The Tribunal directed the assessment to follow the pattern of treating the land as long-term capital gains and the building as short-term capital gains based on the contributions of the assessee-husband and his wife. It also determined that the land and building could be treated as separate assets, upholding the classification of the land as long-term and the building as short-term capital gains. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the cross-objection in part regarding the apportionment of capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>