<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 205 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70468</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of the disallowed gratuity provision back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reevaluation based on the actual payments made into the approved gratuity fund. Emphasizing adherence to section 40A(7) of the Income-tax Act, the tribunal highlighted the necessity of contributions to approved funds for deductibility, setting aside the previous decision for further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 205 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70468</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the issue of the disallowed gratuity provision back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reevaluation based on the actual payments made into the approved gratuity fund. Emphasizing adherence to section 40A(7) of the Income-tax Act, the tribunal highlighted the necessity of contributions to approved funds for deductibility, setting aside the previous decision for further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>