<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 152 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the amount of Rs. 25,593 could not be deducted either as a bad debt or a business loss. The decision was based on the absence of evidence to establish that the amount had become irrecoverable and that it was not advanced during the ordinary course of money-lending business. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with legal principles established in previous judgments by the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 152 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the amount of Rs. 25,593 could not be deducted either as a bad debt or a business loss. The decision was based on the absence of evidence to establish that the amount had become irrecoverable and that it was not advanced during the ordinary course of money-lending business. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligned with legal principles established in previous judgments by the Supreme Court and the Madras High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>