<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 121 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to reopen the assessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s argument of a mere change of opinion. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the interest paid to partners representing their Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) was rightly disallowed under section 40(b) of the Act. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:29:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 121 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to reopen the assessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, dismissing the assessee&#039;s argument of a mere change of opinion. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled that the interest paid to partners representing their Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) was rightly disallowed under section 40(b) of the Act. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>