<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 158 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70433</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with regard to the valuation of the property covered by the road, which was determined to have no marketable value and thus valued at nil. The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision, considering the property&#039;s importance for access to various properties and its easement rights. The issue of valuing cars was not pursued by the assessee&#039;s counsel and was consequently rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 158 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70433</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with regard to the valuation of the property covered by the road, which was determined to have no marketable value and thus valued at nil. The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision, considering the property&#039;s importance for access to various properties and its easement rights. The issue of valuing cars was not pursued by the assessee&#039;s counsel and was consequently rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>