<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (9) TMI 147 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the subsidy received by the assessee should not be deducted from the cost of assets for computing deductions under sections 32, 32A, and 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision of the Special Bench in Pioneer Match Works was followed, and the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:57:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (9) TMI 147 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the subsidy received by the assessee should not be deducted from the cost of assets for computing deductions under sections 32, 32A, and 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decision of the Special Bench in Pioneer Match Works was followed, and the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>