<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (6) TMI 134 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70368</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowances made under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for exceeding prescribed limits on advertisement expenditure. It clarified the interpretation of adjusted and aggregate expenditure, emphasizing that only disallowed amounts should be excluded in determining adjusted expenditure. The tribunal also highlighted that expenses allowed under one sub-section can be considered for disallowance under another. The expression &#039;without prejudice&#039; was analyzed to ensure simultaneous application of relevant sub-sections. The appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the need to interpret provisions in harmony for regulating deductions in business expenses effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:49:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (6) TMI 134 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70368</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowances made under section 37(3A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for exceeding prescribed limits on advertisement expenditure. It clarified the interpretation of adjusted and aggregate expenditure, emphasizing that only disallowed amounts should be excluded in determining adjusted expenditure. The tribunal also highlighted that expenses allowed under one sub-section can be considered for disallowance under another. The expression &#039;without prejudice&#039; was analyzed to ensure simultaneous application of relevant sub-sections. The appeals were dismissed, emphasizing the need to interpret provisions in harmony for regulating deductions in business expenses effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>