<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 133 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amended section of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was applicable, confirming the exclusion of liabilities in the computation of capital employed for relief under section 80J. Despite a difference of opinion among members, the matter was set aside for fresh decision post the Supreme Court or Madras High Court&#039;s ruling on the issue, emphasizing procedural adherence and awaiting a conclusive resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 133 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amended section of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was applicable, confirming the exclusion of liabilities in the computation of capital employed for relief under section 80J. Despite a difference of opinion among members, the matter was set aside for fresh decision post the Supreme Court or Madras High Court&#039;s ruling on the issue, emphasizing procedural adherence and awaiting a conclusive resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>