<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 142 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decisions on all points, dismissing the appeals. It upheld the classification of machinery replacement expenditure as revenue expenditure, allowed settlement payments as deductible business expenses, and mandated adherence to the CBDT&#039;s circular for computing depreciation, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 142 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decisions on all points, dismissing the appeals. It upheld the classification of machinery replacement expenditure as revenue expenditure, allowed settlement payments as deductible business expenses, and mandated adherence to the CBDT&#039;s circular for computing depreciation, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>