<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70345</link>
    <description>A quantified liability remains a debt owed for wealth-tax purposes if it is outstanding on the valuation date, even where an appeal is pending or a stay has been sought, unless the statute expressly excludes deduction. On that basis, disputed sales-tax dues continued to be deductible because the underlying statutory liability had been determined and was still enforceable. The same approach applied to a penalty under foreign exchange law: although challenged and stayed, it remained a subsisting liability and a deductible debt in computing net wealth. The stated ratio is that pendency of proceedings does not extinguish an existing liability for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 17:00:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70345</link>
      <description>A quantified liability remains a debt owed for wealth-tax purposes if it is outstanding on the valuation date, even where an appeal is pending or a stay has been sought, unless the statute expressly excludes deduction. On that basis, disputed sales-tax dues continued to be deductible because the underlying statutory liability had been determined and was still enforceable. The same approach applied to a penalty under foreign exchange law: although challenged and stayed, it remained a subsisting liability and a deductible debt in computing net wealth. The stated ratio is that pendency of proceedings does not extinguish an existing liability for wealth-tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>