<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 158 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the loans provided by the employer to the assessee did not result in any benefit or advantage to the employee. Therefore, the inclusion of the concessional rate of interest as a perquisite under section 17(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was deemed unjustified and deleted. Additionally, the Tribunal favored the assessee in the dispute regarding the deduction claim under section 80L of the Act for interest credited to the provident fund, following a decision by the Allahabad High Court that allowed beneficiaries of a trust to claim such deduction. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 16:08:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 158 - ITAT MADRAS-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the loans provided by the employer to the assessee did not result in any benefit or advantage to the employee. Therefore, the inclusion of the concessional rate of interest as a perquisite under section 17(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was deemed unjustified and deleted. Additionally, the Tribunal favored the assessee in the dispute regarding the deduction claim under section 80L of the Act for interest credited to the provident fund, following a decision by the Allahabad High Court that allowed beneficiaries of a trust to claim such deduction. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>