<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 103 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70326</link>
    <description>For an insurer, tax deducted at source credit on dividend income could not be denied merely because income was computed under the special insurance regime: Section 44 and the First Schedule permit exclusion only where Rule 4 specifically applies to an actuarial valuation covering an inter-valuation period exceeding twelve months, so the normal operation of Sections 194 and 199 remained intact on the facts stated. The reassessment was also unsustainable because an audit party&#039;s opinion on a question of law is not valid information for reopening, and no escapement of income was shown. The revised assessment was therefore cancelled in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:20:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 103 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70326</link>
      <description>For an insurer, tax deducted at source credit on dividend income could not be denied merely because income was computed under the special insurance regime: Section 44 and the First Schedule permit exclusion only where Rule 4 specifically applies to an actuarial valuation covering an inter-valuation period exceeding twelve months, so the normal operation of Sections 194 and 199 remained intact on the facts stated. The reassessment was also unsustainable because an audit party&#039;s opinion on a question of law is not valid information for reopening, and no escapement of income was shown. The revised assessment was therefore cancelled in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>