<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 240 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70323</link>
    <description>Compensation for statutory requisition of land and building was held not taxable as capital gains or as income because requisition under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 only placed the property under State control and did not amount to a transfer of ownership or rights in property. The payment was confined to loss of use and enjoyment, so it fell outside section 45(5) and outside the charging provisions generally. Litigation s relating to enhanced compensation were allowed only on a proportionate basis where the proceedings covered both taxable acquisition compensation and non-taxable requisition compensation, with expenditure linked to the non-taxable component excluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 240 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70323</link>
      <description>Compensation for statutory requisition of land and building was held not taxable as capital gains or as income because requisition under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 only placed the property under State control and did not amount to a transfer of ownership or rights in property. The payment was confined to loss of use and enjoyment, so it fell outside section 45(5) and outside the charging provisions generally. Litigation s relating to enhanced compensation were allowed only on a proportionate basis where the proceedings covered both taxable acquisition compensation and non-taxable requisition compensation, with expenditure linked to the non-taxable component excluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>