https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70319 The appeals were partly allowed, with some issues decided in favor of the assessee and others remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring compliance with relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents. Key outcomes included the allowance of interest on capital work-in-progress based on a Supreme Court decision, remittance of ERP implementation expenses and consultancy payment issues for further examination, clarification on exemption under section 10B for the EOU unit, exclusion of duty and sales tax from 'total turnover' for relief under section 80HHC, and directions for re-examining expenditure on concrete roads and prior period adjustment. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70319 The appeals were partly allowed, with some issues decided in favor of the assessee and others remitted back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring compliance with relevant legal provisions and judicial precedents. Key outcomes included the allowance of interest on capital work-in-progress based on a Supreme Court decision, remittance of ERP implementation expenses and consultancy payment issues for further examination, clarification on exemption under section 10B for the EOU unit, exclusion of duty and sales tax from 'total turnover' for relief under section 80HHC, and directions for re-examining expenditure on concrete roads and prior period adjustment. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70319