<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 331 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rectified its previous order by amending paragraphs 11 to 16 to align with Supreme Court precedents, acknowledging the binding nature of contractual liabilities. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the claims for liquidated damages, addressing the oversight of relevant accounting methods and preventing a miscarriage of justice, thereby upholding the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 331 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rectified its previous order by amending paragraphs 11 to 16 to align with Supreme Court precedents, acknowledging the binding nature of contractual liabilities. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the claims for liquidated damages, addressing the oversight of relevant accounting methods and preventing a miscarriage of justice, thereby upholding the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>