<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 305 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70303</link>
    <description>The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal affirmed the allowance grants for additional depreciation, section 80-I, and investment allowance, stating the activities constituted manufacturing. It upheld the deduction under section 80HHC for processed granite, applying a circular retrospectively. The addition towards closing stock valuation was also rejected, as the consistent method was accepted in prior years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 305 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70303</link>
      <description>The appeals by the Revenue were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The Tribunal affirmed the allowance grants for additional depreciation, section 80-I, and investment allowance, stating the activities constituted manufacturing. It upheld the deduction under section 80HHC for processed granite, applying a circular retrospectively. The addition towards closing stock valuation was also rejected, as the consistent method was accepted in prior years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>