<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 291 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70302</link>
    <description>The Special Bench dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the revenue. It concluded that under section 32(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the appellant could not set off brought forward depreciation loss against capital gains. The decision emphasized strict adherence to statutory provisions, denying the appellant&#039;s claim based on the specific facts and legal framework applicable to the assessment years involved. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 291 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70302</link>
      <description>The Special Bench dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the revenue. It concluded that under section 32(2)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the appellant could not set off brought forward depreciation loss against capital gains. The decision emphasized strict adherence to statutory provisions, denying the appellant&#039;s claim based on the specific facts and legal framework applicable to the assessment years involved. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>