<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 322 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous petition, rectifying the order by addressing the non-consideration of an additional ground raised by the assessee. It was found that deductions under Section 32AB should precede deductions under Sections 80HH and 80-I. Additionally, common expenses must be allocated proportionately to each industrial undertaking for computing eligible profits under Sections 80HH and 80-I, in line with relevant court judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 322 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the miscellaneous petition, rectifying the order by addressing the non-consideration of an additional ground raised by the assessee. It was found that deductions under Section 32AB should precede deductions under Sections 80HH and 80-I. Additionally, common expenses must be allocated proportionately to each industrial undertaking for computing eligible profits under Sections 80HH and 80-I, in line with relevant court judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>