<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 117 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70291</link>
    <description>After an earlier partition had severed the larger coparcenary, and the assessee&#039;s sons had already separated, the assessee was left as the sole surviving coparcener after his wife&#039;s death. On those facts, the remaining ancestral properties were under his absolute power of disposition and were assessable in his individual hands, not as Hindu undivided family wealth. The principle that a single surviving coparcener may still constitute an HUF was held inapplicable because no other family member with subsisting rights remained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 117 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70291</link>
      <description>After an earlier partition had severed the larger coparcenary, and the assessee&#039;s sons had already separated, the assessee was left as the sole surviving coparcener after his wife&#039;s death. On those facts, the remaining ancestral properties were under his absolute power of disposition and were assessable in his individual hands, not as Hindu undivided family wealth. The principle that a single surviving coparcener may still constitute an HUF was held inapplicable because no other family member with subsisting rights remained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>