<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 227 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1982-83, 1985-86, and 1986-87, while partly allowing the appeals for 1983-84 and 1984-85. It held that the reopening of assessments under Section 147(b) was invalid, the restaurant was entitled to investment allowance, the building qualified as a plant, and interest under Section 217 was not chargeable in the reopened assessment. The disallowance of advertisement expenditure was upheld due to lack of arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 12:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 227 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 1982-83, 1985-86, and 1986-87, while partly allowing the appeals for 1983-84 and 1984-85. It held that the reopening of assessments under Section 147(b) was invalid, the restaurant was entitled to investment allowance, the building qualified as a plant, and interest under Section 217 was not chargeable in the reopened assessment. The disallowance of advertisement expenditure was upheld due to lack of arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>