<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 191 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70277</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on the assessment of income from a contract in the hands of a firm versus an individual partner. The court determined that the income derived by the firm should be included only in the firm&#039;s total income, directing the Income Tax Officer to recompute the income for both the firm and the individual partner. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, with the firm&#039;s income being excluded from the individual partner&#039;s assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:45:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 191 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70277</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on the assessment of income from a contract in the hands of a firm versus an individual partner. The court determined that the income derived by the firm should be included only in the firm&#039;s total income, directing the Income Tax Officer to recompute the income for both the firm and the individual partner. Consequently, both appeals were allowed, with the firm&#039;s income being excluded from the individual partner&#039;s assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>