<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 137 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70261</link>
    <description>A bona fide family arrangement made to resolve an existing family dispute and prevent further litigation was treated as a settlement of family claims, not as a taxable gift. Where the payment was genuinely referable to adjustment of family rights and was made to preserve peace and goodwill among relatives, the benefit under the arrangement did not attract gift-tax. On that basis, the payment of Rs. 1 lakh by each assessee was held not exigible to gift-tax, and the assessment was set aside in favour of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:02:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 137 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70261</link>
      <description>A bona fide family arrangement made to resolve an existing family dispute and prevent further litigation was treated as a settlement of family claims, not as a taxable gift. Where the payment was genuinely referable to adjustment of family rights and was made to preserve peace and goodwill among relatives, the benefit under the arrangement did not attract gift-tax. On that basis, the payment of Rs. 1 lakh by each assessee was held not exigible to gift-tax, and the assessment was set aside in favour of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>