<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 202 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70251</link>
    <description>Malaysian share income was held not includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under the Income-tax Act in light of Article 22.1 of the India-Malaysia DTAA. The Tribunal followed its earlier Special Bench view and later Tribunal order, which had examined the treaty provision and prior judicial observations and concluded that such income could not be brought to tax in the assessee&#039;s assessment. The appellate authority&#039;s deletion of the addition was therefore upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:42:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 202 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70251</link>
      <description>Malaysian share income was held not includible in the assessee&#039;s total income under the Income-tax Act in light of Article 22.1 of the India-Malaysia DTAA. The Tribunal followed its earlier Special Bench view and later Tribunal order, which had examined the treaty provision and prior judicial observations and concluded that such income could not be brought to tax in the assessee&#039;s assessment. The appellate authority&#039;s deletion of the addition was therefore upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>