https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70239 The appeals centered on the deductibility of salary claimed by Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) as remuneration to their Karthas. The Revenue argued against deducting the salary, but the Appellate Authority Commission (AAC) allowed the appeals, stating that the Karthas provided specific services to the firm and the HUF funds were unaffected. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the partnership deed's provision for salary payment to partners, distinguishing individual service income from HUF income. Consequently, the ITAT affirmed that the salary paid to partners should not be included in HUF assessments, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:19:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70239 The appeals centered on the deductibility of salary claimed by Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) as remuneration to their Karthas. The Revenue argued against deducting the salary, but the Appellate Authority Commission (AAC) allowed the appeals, stating that the Karthas provided specific services to the firm and the HUF funds were unaffected. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the partnership deed's provision for salary payment to partners, distinguishing individual service income from HUF income. Consequently, the ITAT affirmed that the salary paid to partners should not be included in HUF assessments, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70239