<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 169 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the travelling allowance, ruling that hotel expenses at the destination are considered &quot;expenditure incurred in connection with travelling&quot; under Section 37(3) and Rule 6D. The Tribunal emphasized legislative intent to restrict excessive travel expenses, dismissing the appeal and highlighting that equitable considerations do not apply to tax statute interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 169 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the travelling allowance, ruling that hotel expenses at the destination are considered &quot;expenditure incurred in connection with travelling&quot; under Section 37(3) and Rule 6D. The Tribunal emphasized legislative intent to restrict excessive travel expenses, dismissing the appeal and highlighting that equitable considerations do not apply to tax statute interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>