<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 209 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70219</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the release of rights by the coparcener should be viewed as a release of undivided coparcenary interest, not a transfer subject to gift-tax. By maintaining consistency between the Income Tax Act and gift-tax assessments, the tribunal concluded that the transaction did not attract gift-tax liability. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was accepted, and the gift-tax assessment was annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 209 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70219</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the release of rights by the coparcener should be viewed as a release of undivided coparcenary interest, not a transfer subject to gift-tax. By maintaining consistency between the Income Tax Act and gift-tax assessments, the tribunal concluded that the transaction did not attract gift-tax liability. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was accepted, and the gift-tax assessment was annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>