<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 254 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest on a refund of Rs. 9,00,000 seized during a search operation was not warranted as the block assessment was completed before the expiry of the six-month period specified under section 132B(4)(b). Therefore, the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to deny interest on the refunded amount was upheld, and the appeal filed by the revenue was allowed with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 254 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest on a refund of Rs. 9,00,000 seized during a search operation was not warranted as the block assessment was completed before the expiry of the six-month period specified under section 132B(4)(b). Therefore, the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to deny interest on the refunded amount was upheld, and the appeal filed by the revenue was allowed with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>