<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (11) TMI 102 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for investment allowance under section 32A of the IT Act for hiring out bulldozers, ruling that the machinery was used in the business of construction, entitling the assessee to the allowance. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the eligibility of guarantee commission as a business deduction based on legal interpretations and precedents, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal on this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:19:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (11) TMI 102 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for investment allowance under section 32A of the IT Act for hiring out bulldozers, ruling that the machinery was used in the business of construction, entitling the assessee to the allowance. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the eligibility of guarantee commission as a business deduction based on legal interpretations and precedents, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal on this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>