<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 152 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the addition of Rs. 12,177. It found that the assessee consistently followed the mercantile system of accounting for sales-tax collections, enabling them to deduct the sales-tax liability that arose during the year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the mercantile system principle and cited relevant legal precedents to support its decision, overturning the earlier addition based on the methodology adopted by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 152 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by deleting the addition of Rs. 12,177. It found that the assessee consistently followed the mercantile system of accounting for sales-tax collections, enabling them to deduct the sales-tax liability that arose during the year. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to the mercantile system principle and cited relevant legal precedents to support its decision, overturning the earlier addition based on the methodology adopted by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>