<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (6) TMI 92 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70170</link>
    <description>Penalty for belated filing under section 271(1)(a) was held unjustified where the assessee explained that, after retirement, he had to rely on his former office for leave-salary particulars and to trace a misplaced income-tax file. The delay was not found to reflect conscious neglect, deliberate default, or wanton disregard of the filing obligation. On those facts, the explanation was accepted as reasonable cause and the penalty was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:58:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (6) TMI 92 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70170</link>
      <description>Penalty for belated filing under section 271(1)(a) was held unjustified where the assessee explained that, after retirement, he had to rely on his former office for leave-salary particulars and to trace a misplaced income-tax file. The delay was not found to reflect conscious neglect, deliberate default, or wanton disregard of the filing obligation. On those facts, the explanation was accepted as reasonable cause and the penalty was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>