https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70159 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining her as the rightful owner of the disputed property. The Tribunal considered the evidence presented, including a court-confirmed agreement with Mr. Lingiah Naidu and the assessee's possession and management of the property. Rejecting the department's claim that the property belonged to the father-in-law, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee had valid ownership, leading to the reversal of previous assessments. Consequently, the income from the property for the relevant years was held assessable in the assessee's hands. en-us Fri, 30 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:41:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70159 The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining her as the rightful owner of the disputed property. The Tribunal considered the evidence presented, including a court-confirmed agreement with Mr. Lingiah Naidu and the assessee's possession and management of the property. Rejecting the department's claim that the property belonged to the father-in-law, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee had valid ownership, leading to the reversal of previous assessments. Consequently, the income from the property for the relevant years was held assessable in the assessee's hands. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 30 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70159