<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (6) TMI 85 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 on interest income for concealment but ruled out penalty on the deposit amount. It held that penalty is applicable only if income was earned and concealed by the assessee, following the Karnataka High Court ruling. The Tribunal dismissed departmental appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, affirming the AAC&#039;s decision on the penalty for interest income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (6) TMI 85 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 on interest income for concealment but ruled out penalty on the deposit amount. It held that penalty is applicable only if income was earned and concealed by the assessee, following the Karnataka High Court ruling. The Tribunal dismissed departmental appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, affirming the AAC&#039;s decision on the penalty for interest income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>