<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 96 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income-tax lacked jurisdiction to invoke section 263 in the case. The assessment was deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests, as the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the secret commission payments. The majority decision favored the assessee, allowing their appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 96 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income-tax lacked jurisdiction to invoke section 263 in the case. The assessment was deemed not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests, as the Assessing Officer had adequately examined the secret commission payments. The majority decision favored the assessee, allowing their appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>