<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 99 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the interest component under the IDBI Bills Rediscounting Scheme should be included in the actual cost of assets, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument to exclude it. Contributions made to the Death Relief Fund were deemed deductible as they were set up under the Industrial Disputes Act, exempting them from disallowance under section 40A(9). However, the claim for deduction of surtax liability was disallowed in line with precedent. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions generally favored the assessees, allowing enhanced depreciation and confirming the inclusion of interest in the actual cost, while disallowing surtax liability claims where applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:14:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 99 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the interest component under the IDBI Bills Rediscounting Scheme should be included in the actual cost of assets, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument to exclude it. Contributions made to the Death Relief Fund were deemed deductible as they were set up under the Industrial Disputes Act, exempting them from disallowance under section 40A(9). However, the claim for deduction of surtax liability was disallowed in line with precedent. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions generally favored the assessees, allowing enhanced depreciation and confirming the inclusion of interest in the actual cost, while disallowing surtax liability claims where applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>