<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (10) TMI 112 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the widow of the deceased could be considered an &#039;executrix&#039; by implication. It ruled that the right to receive life insurance amounts should not be included in the assessee&#039;s wealth but separately taxable under section 19A. The valuation of the right to receive the amounts was fixed at 30% of the total figure due to uncertainties surrounding the payment. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the amount in question was directed to be excluded from the assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:07:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (10) TMI 112 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the widow of the deceased could be considered an &#039;executrix&#039; by implication. It ruled that the right to receive life insurance amounts should not be included in the assessee&#039;s wealth but separately taxable under section 19A. The valuation of the right to receive the amounts was fixed at 30% of the total figure due to uncertainties surrounding the payment. As a result, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the amount in question was directed to be excluded from the assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>