<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 299 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70085</link>
    <description>A lump sum received under a collaboration agreement for transfer of technical know-how and supporting documentation delivered abroad was not characterised as royalty because the know-how was supplied for plant set-up and there was no immediate use of it in India during the relevant year. The receipt was instead taxable as fees for technical services under the governing treaty and domestic law, as the arrangement concerned technical assistance and documentation linked to establishing the manufacturing unit rather than a royalty-bearing exploitation of know-how. On those facts, the tax treatment was determined in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:54:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 299 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70085</link>
      <description>A lump sum received under a collaboration agreement for transfer of technical know-how and supporting documentation delivered abroad was not characterised as royalty because the know-how was supplied for plant set-up and there was no immediate use of it in India during the relevant year. The receipt was instead taxable as fees for technical services under the governing treaty and domestic law, as the arrangement concerned technical assistance and documentation linked to establishing the manufacturing unit rather than a royalty-bearing exploitation of know-how. On those facts, the tax treatment was determined in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>