<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the excess 5% payment to employees as an incentive wage under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It differentiated between bonus, a statutory right, and incentives, emphasizing that the incentive wage was granted for settling an industrial dispute and maintaining business operations. The Tribunal held that the payment was deductible under section 37(1) due to commercial expediency, dismissing the departmental appeal and affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:22:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 176 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the excess 5% payment to employees as an incentive wage under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It differentiated between bonus, a statutory right, and incentives, emphasizing that the incentive wage was granted for settling an industrial dispute and maintaining business operations. The Tribunal held that the payment was deductible under section 37(1) due to commercial expediency, dismissing the departmental appeal and affirming the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>