<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 136 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70068</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-C dismissed the public limited company&#039;s appeal and allowed the department&#039;s appeal in a case concerning the claim of expenditure under section 35(2)(ia) of the Income-tax Act for scientific research related to business. The Tribunal held that the company&#039;s activities did not meet the criteria for scientific research as defined under the Act, emphasizing the need for evidence supporting the claim. The decision clarified the distinction between business operations and scientific research for tax deduction purposes, setting a precedent for evaluating expenditure claims related to scientific research in the business context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:09:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 136 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70068</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT MADRAS-C dismissed the public limited company&#039;s appeal and allowed the department&#039;s appeal in a case concerning the claim of expenditure under section 35(2)(ia) of the Income-tax Act for scientific research related to business. The Tribunal held that the company&#039;s activities did not meet the criteria for scientific research as defined under the Act, emphasizing the need for evidence supporting the claim. The decision clarified the distinction between business operations and scientific research for tax deduction purposes, setting a precedent for evaluating expenditure claims related to scientific research in the business context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>