<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 262 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70064</link>
    <description>In block assessment under Ch XIV-B, the dominant issue was whether fixed deposits in benami/fictitious names, discovered only through post-search investigation and not evidenced by assets/documents found during search, could be assessed as &quot;undisclosed income.&quot; Applying s.158BB and the statutory limitation that block computation must rest on material found &quot;as a result of search,&quot; the Tribunal held such deposits fell outside the permissible evidentiary base; the addition was deleted. On the separate issue of bad debts from regular business dealings already forming part of regular assessments, the Tribunal held Ch XIV-B is not a forum for routine computation claims; the deduction was rightly disallowed in block computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:39:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 262 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70064</link>
      <description>In block assessment under Ch XIV-B, the dominant issue was whether fixed deposits in benami/fictitious names, discovered only through post-search investigation and not evidenced by assets/documents found during search, could be assessed as &quot;undisclosed income.&quot; Applying s.158BB and the statutory limitation that block computation must rest on material found &quot;as a result of search,&quot; the Tribunal held such deposits fell outside the permissible evidentiary base; the addition was deleted. On the separate issue of bad debts from regular business dealings already forming part of regular assessments, the Tribunal held Ch XIV-B is not a forum for routine computation claims; the deduction was rightly disallowed in block computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>