<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 137 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous petition, emphasizing the importance of following judicial precedents and the correct interpretation of statutory provisions. The Tribunal held that there was no mistake apparent from the record in its order dated 29-4-1997, rejecting the arguments of the assessee&#039;s counsel regarding the sterilization of other provisions of the Act under section 115J.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:19:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 137 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous petition, emphasizing the importance of following judicial precedents and the correct interpretation of statutory provisions. The Tribunal held that there was no mistake apparent from the record in its order dated 29-4-1997, rejecting the arguments of the assessee&#039;s counsel regarding the sterilization of other provisions of the Act under section 115J.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>