<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 120 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 dated 30-3-1990 could not be sustained due to the defective notice, inappropriate setting aside of entire assessments, and the incorrect conclusion regarding the depreciation rate. The appeals were allowed, and the CIT&#039;s order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:03:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 120 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 dated 30-3-1990 could not be sustained due to the defective notice, inappropriate setting aside of entire assessments, and the incorrect conclusion regarding the depreciation rate. The appeals were allowed, and the CIT&#039;s order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>