<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 83 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70040</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the assessee, a partner in two firms, was not entitled to a deduction under section 32AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the firms had already claimed and received the deduction based on their deposits. The tribunal clarified that the deduction is only available to the firm conducting the eligible business, not its partners. Therefore, the department&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 32AB was denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:30:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 83 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70040</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the assessee, a partner in two firms, was not entitled to a deduction under section 32AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the firms had already claimed and received the deduction based on their deposits. The tribunal clarified that the deduction is only available to the firm conducting the eligible business, not its partners. Therefore, the department&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 32AB was denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>