<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling that the bad debt claim of Rs. 70,525 was premature as the debt had not been conclusively proven as irrecoverable during the relevant previous year. Additionally, the revenue deduction claim for retrenchment compensation of Rs. 36,411 was disallowed as it was not considered a business loss but rather rental income. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 145 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling that the bad debt claim of Rs. 70,525 was premature as the debt had not been conclusively proven as irrecoverable during the relevant previous year. Additionally, the revenue deduction claim for retrenchment compensation of Rs. 36,411 was disallowed as it was not considered a business loss but rather rental income. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>