<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 134 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in the case involving disallowance of miscellaneous expenditure and Dealers&#039; Conference expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It found the estimates for miscellaneous expenditure excessive, reducing them by 50%. Regarding the Dealers&#039; Conference expenditure, it determined the main purpose was sales promotion, not entertainment, directing the I.T.O. to disallow the sum under section 37(3A) as specified in sub-section (3B). The Tribunal emphasized the expenditure&#039;s sales promotion nature, despite some entertainment element, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:19:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 134 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in the case involving disallowance of miscellaneous expenditure and Dealers&#039; Conference expenditure under the Income-tax Act, 1961. It found the estimates for miscellaneous expenditure excessive, reducing them by 50%. Regarding the Dealers&#039; Conference expenditure, it determined the main purpose was sales promotion, not entertainment, directing the I.T.O. to disallow the sum under section 37(3A) as specified in sub-section (3B). The Tribunal emphasized the expenditure&#039;s sales promotion nature, despite some entertainment element, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>