<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 108 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70023</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to levy interest under section 217(1)(a) against the assessee for non-compliance with advance tax requirements, resulting in the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the legal obligations of old assessees regarding advance tax payments and the importance of timely compliance with the provisions outlined in the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:05:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=108376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 108 - ITAT MADRAS-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70023</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to levy interest under section 217(1)(a) against the assessee for non-compliance with advance tax requirements, resulting in the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the legal obligations of old assessees regarding advance tax payments and the importance of timely compliance with the provisions outlined in the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=70023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>